Some of my followers enjoy ancient history incl. learning more about the Illuminati. So in the middle of all these end-time crises, I am providing something I wrote on ancient history for a college class. Of course, I don’t mean by posting this to take away from the intensity of the craziness of these times… as the World Order tries to genocide us, the global economy melts down, & all kinds of disasters loom on the horizon. The importance of this post is to correctly assign the origin of civilization-technology-& writing. The Biblical account places the focus on Mesopotamia, and those people who are later known as Aryan, all concepts which have fallen out of fashion to acknowledge. There are a number of historical inaccuracies being taught today, that given time I would like to correct, and one of them is that these 3 civilizations rose independently. Setting the record straight also has significance in revealing the true history of the ancient ruling bloodlines that have now become the Illuminati.
WERE THEY RELATED? We read in the history books about three contemporaneous significant civilizations: ancient Sumer (on the Tigris and Euphrates rivers), ancient Egypt (on the Nile) and the one on the Indus River. The first two play significant roles in early Biblical accounts. Many books & articles have been written about these civilizations as if they were independent & unrelated. To paraphrase one writer, “These civilizations arose independently and did not have contact with each other.” This misinformation clouds an important time period of history, & the origin of western civilization so this post is written to challenge that. If we examine the seals of the first Pharaoh of Egypt & the seals of his ancestors & his descendants who ruled over the first dynasty of Egypt, we discover that these seals are almost identical to the rulers of Sumer & the Indus Valley. This and other evidence show that not only were the three civilizations connected, they were at that time part of the same kingdom!

COMMONALITIES. The experts who examine items from the three civilizations in the 2,500-3,000 B.C. time period often note connections between them, but somehow the implications get lost, perhaps because these areas (Egypt, Iraq & Pakistan-India) were often separate political entities for the remainder of history. The tombs of the first dynasty Egyptian pharaohs used Sumerian paneled-façade type architecture. Lapis Lazuli (for instance, found in beads) from the Indus Valley are found in Sumer & Egypt at that time period. Likewise, Egyptian knife handles have Sumerian motifs. Sumerian & Egyptian seals from that time period show identical buildings. The phonetic values of the pictures used for writing in Sumer match the phonetic pictograph values of archaic Egypt. All three civilizations used pictographic writing. Linen, sun-worship, and similar potter’s wheel pottery are a few of other similar everyday items. The Sumerian statues were made of diorite blocks from Egypt’s Sinai. Walter B. Emery in “Archaic Egypt” writes: “The civilization of the Jemdet Nasr period of Mesopotamia and the archaic period of Egypt are apparently roughly contemporary, but the interesting point is that in Mesopotamia many of the features of civilization appear to have a background, whereas in Egypt they do not. It is on this basis that many authorities consider that Egypt owes her civilization to the people of the Euphrates. There is no doubt that there is a connection…” Walter B. Emery in “Archaic Egypt”. So what is that connection?
MANJ THE WARRIOR, the UNITER OF UPPER & LOWER EGYPT. The King Lists of the three civilizations clearly show the first Pharaoh of Egypt also appears in the King lists of Sumer & the Aryan kings written about in the Indian Epics, the Puranas. Also the seals from the three areas match. The first Egyptian Pharaoh popularly known as Menes (Mnj in Egyptian writing, “Menes” is the koine Greek version of the name) was a Sumerian crown prince, & the governor of the Indus Valley before transferring to Egypt. A tri-lingual examination reveals the same group of aristocrats associated with Menes in Sumerian, Egyptian & Indian accounts. The Egyptian writing calls him “Manj-the-warrior” and the Sumerian accounts refer to him as “Manis-the-warrior”. The solar versions of the Puranas refer to him as Asa Manja (Manja-the-shooter). In the lunar version he is “Manja-the-uniter”. The Egyptian accounts also call him “the uniter”. The Maha-Bharata account says that he was of the line of Pharaohs (Paraa) of the royal eye of Gopta (which is Kopt, & Gabt, an ancient name of Egypt).

MANJ’S FATHER. The Indian accounts say he was the son of the world ruler Sha-Kuni, which is easy to recognize as Shar-Guni, who has been given the modern name “Sargon the Great”, who unified the Sumer city-states with Mesopotamia, Asia Minor & Iran. Sargon’s official inscriptions at the Nippur Temple claim he ruled “the Four Quarter of the World”, vastly more than is accorded him today, and that he conquered Egypt in the 11th year of his reign. One of the Indian accounts say this Sha-Kuni was son of Egypt & the Sinai. In the Indian lists Menes’ grandfather was Puru, which matches Puru-Gin of the Sumerian lists. The Sumerian word for “lord” was Baru, the Indian sanskrit is Prabhu and are both applied to their equivalents of Menes. All three areas use the icon of the royal eye in inscriptions to Menes also. The exact same “eye over a throne” pictograph from Sumer is seen in remains in Egypt applying to Menes and Sumer to Manish-tu. “Tu” according a scholar of Sumerian means “warrior”.

MENES WAS GOVERNOR OF FIRST INDIA, THEN EGYPT, and THEN REVOLTED. Sir Flinders Petrie found Sumerian pictographs names of Sargon & his wife in a predynastic tomb at Abydos which Egyptologists had not recognized because the names in pictograph writing is different from hieroglyphics. L.A. Waddell was able to read these inscriptions in the old Sumerian pictographs and realize they exactly matched the archaic Sumerian writing describing what is now known as Sargon the Great and his Queen Tashlultum (Lady Ash). Seals of Sargon the Great were also found in Mohenjo Daro and Harappa, major cities of the Indus civilization. One document from Mesopotamia says that Manish-tu and Sargon had a falling out. Other artifacts also point to a separation between the two & that Manes (Manish) revolted and led Egypt out of his father’s empire.

FINAL THOUGHTS. It is not within the scope of this paper to describe why the Sumerian origin of Egyptian civilization has been clouded, except to mention that it could in part well relate to biases & agendas. There is no question that after the first dynasty of Egypt, that the three areas under discussion developed along different lines. Even so, one still can find considerable cross-overs, such as the Royal Sumerian cylinder-seal celebrating the coming of the Age of Aries that copied Egyptian art including Egyptian hieroglyphs. Both areas continued to use the winged-sun-disk & build pyramid type structures. To say that the Egypt & Mesopotamia developed independently is false, and the evidence presented in this paper should lead the reader towards the conclusion that the three civilizations were once part of Sargon the Great’s extensive empire. How does this relate to the Illuminati? Manly P. Hall, who was Freemasonry’s greatest philosopher & a Grand Master in both the Illum. & Freemasonry, said that a single powerful council of high priests controlled the mystery religions in India, Mesopotamia, the Middle East, Egypt & southern Europe in ancient times. It is important then to realize that the polytheistic sun worship in these areas all had a common origin. They have been secretly manipulated by the same ruling hierarchy of hereditary occult priests since history began.



So empty here ... leave a comment!

Leave a Reply