EBOLA…LOVE ALL, TRUST A FEW, DO WRONG TO NONE: a discussion on what is real & what is staged about Ebola. This post covers some reports that hint that the reality about Ebola is not being reported. My personal take is expressed by the Greek one-word expression: “epoke”—meaning: “I have the freedom not to have answers for everything & to know everything”. The little I do know is disturbing; Jon Rappoport & Felicia Popescu, solid skeptics of World’s media reports, have pioneered efforts to question the mass media’s version of things. Jon’s articles can be read at info at nomorefakenews
AFRICAN PROVERB: Be careful when a naked person offers you a shirt. The area of Africa with Ebola has been struggling with many diseases. Some of the regions have factories from the elite’s transnational corp. that are killing the surrounding populations with toxins, & the locals can’t get any relief. So keep in mind, that the same people that run these polluting transnational corporations also control people in WHO and Monsanto, etc. On my end of things, I have not cleared away the fog, to be able to know much on the Ebola subject. I humbly offer the following for your consideration merely to help us wade through the media’s disinfo.
IMMUNITY POSSIBLE. A CDC website page entitled, “Ebola (Ebola Virus Disease): Signs and Symptoms,” states: “People who recover from Ebola infection develop antibodies that last for at least 10 years.” This means that Ebola is similar to other diseases, if you survive it, your body has built up a long term resistance. In the German reference “Der Tod aus dem Regenwald.” Die Woche, 19 May, ’95, pgs. 26-27, it states that in 1995 they had discovered that 20% of Zaire’s population appeared to have antibodies & natural immunity to Ebola. So we have a problem here, tests that are being used today to detect Eblola using the presence of antibodies may be misdiagnosing people with natural immunity as carriers. With so many people naturally immune, it also raises the question as to whether such a population could really support a pandemic. So how accurate are their tests for Ebola???
EXPERTS DOUBT THE VALIDITY OF THE TESTS. Realizing the inaccuracy of the Ebola tests, Jon Rappoport makes the observation: “At that point, you can look for illness and death stemming from a number of causes. And you’re driven to the fact that, in Africa, large numbers of people have been dying for a very long time, for reasons that have nothing to do with germs: Grinding poverty, war, starvation and severe malnutrition, contaminated water, pesticides, lack of basic sanitation, extreme overcrowding, stolen farm land, toxic medicines, and so on.” From the beginning, experts on Ebola have seriously doubted a number of things being reported on Ebola. Some doubts were expressed & recorded at the 1977 Colloquim of Ebola held in Belgium. The conference produced a 280 page report entitled: “Ebola Virus Haemorrhagic Fever: Proceedings of an International Colloquium on Ebola Virus Infection and Other Haemorrhagic Fevers held in Antwerp, Belgium, 6-8 December, 1977.”
The report states, “It is impossible to consider the virological diagnosis of Ebola virus infection loose [apart] from the diagnosis of haemorrhagic fevers in general. The clinical picture of the disease indeed is too nonspecific to allow any hypothesis as to which virus may be responsible for any given case.” In other words, this means in reality that the signs & symptoms of other haemorrhagic fevers could be mistaken by the tests for Ebola! Hmmm!
Another shocking quote in the conference report of Ebola experts: “…it is becoming clear, to us at least, that the more work you do with the FA-Test [an antibody test for Ebola diagnosis] the more interesting, the more complicated and the more biologically sloppy the results become. I would urge very great caution in making any kind of final interpretation of what you have just heard [from other presenters]…I cannot explain how a Panamanian Indian can have antibodies to Ebola virus. I don’t think these are real antibodies. Of course if these are not, it means that any others in a given serum [blood sample from a patient] may not be as well. It is clear that we must have an alternative and a much more specific method with which we can answer these questions. Several facts suggest endemicity of Ebola in Zaire…I’m beginning to believe that the virus may in fact be endemic in Zaire.” By saying endemic in Zaire, he is simply saying Ebola has been around in Zaire for so long that people have developed a natural immunity to it. Jon draws the obvious conclusion: “The meaning of this is ominous: such people, if they receive an antibody test for Ebola, even though they are now healthy, can be labeled “Ebola,” and treated accordingly: shunned, quarantined, attacked.”
SUMMARY. This has been a short look at some info that brings into question what the World Matrix’s media is telling us. To me, it indicates that we need to be careful about what we think we know about the warnings concerning an Ebola Pandemic. The truth will set us free…Be blessed my friend.